A
Postcard from Coastal Victoria
Tim
Hart
AILA Vic Group President
June 2004
During
the recent New Year break, I visited a number of Victorian
coastal towns. In this- The Year of the Built Environment,
my holiday experience highlighted the significant development
pressures that are being placed on our coastal environments
and left me questioning how effective landscape architects
are in influencing this process.
Many
Victorian coastal towns have undergone something of a Seachange
led resurgence. The lure of a more relaxed lifestyle and the
beach environment has meant that the population in some coastal
towns has increased up to 30% in the past 5 years. A boom in
property values has further spurned the development process,
however it seems that many local councils have failed to implement
sufficient planning controls and development guidelines to
positively influence this change. It also seems that many developers
have imported a “suburban” approach to the development
process, thereby creating the same type of built environment
that many residents have tried to leave behind.
Two
recently constructed housing estates that I visited were integrated
with large golf course developments. Both developments were
constructed on rural fringe / farmland with direct beach access.
Although different in their image making, both developers had
missed the opportunity to build on the essential qualities
of their locality or landscape context.
This
imported or themed approach to landscape appears to underlie
many residential developments and is perceived to be critical
to the marketing success of a project. This approach however
sits uncomfortably in a naturally powerful and evocative coastal
environment that is very marketable in its own right. One must
question the logic of diminishing the qualities of the very
setting potential investors have come to enjoy.
The
two developments were quite different in their adopted design
style but both appeared to set themselves outside of their
landscape context, rather than attempting to integrate with
the indigenous coastal landscape. This approach was exacerbated
by the use of standard detailing, and streetscape design common
to many outer suburban housing estates with roll over kerb
and channel, formal exotic avenue plantings and ornamental
landscape treatments. Most disappointing, particularly in this
ideal environment, was the lack of any integration of water
sensitive urban design initiatives.
Although
these developments offer good access to open space and recreation
opportunities, they are manifestations of an enclave typology
that lacks permeability or connectivity to adjacent developments
and facilities. In addition due to their fringe locality, access
to services is very poor, with residents entirely reliant on
car access.
The
construction of this type of golf course and residential estate
is currently booming in parts of North America. While they
are not new to this country, if a similar level of development
occurs on a per capita basis in Australia, they represent a
significant opportunity for landscape architects to positively
influence the quality and form of these developments.
This
type of high profile project, with their significant budgets,
should showcase the role of our discipline in providing solutions
that are cognisant of their context and demonstrate the benefits
of integrated environmental design solutions.
We
must ensure that our skills are not stifled by the misguided
power of marketing, particularly its narrowly scoped lifestyle
and image making approach to design.