|

2004 AILA
National Conference Refereed
papers
|
| |
|
ISBN
0-909947-07-4 |
| |
Format
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Indeterminacy & Self-Organisation
Rosalea Monacella
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Landscape
Ethics:
What values govern our decision making, and how does a landscape ethic
permeate what we do?
Andrew MacKenzie
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
Melbourne Docklands ESD Guide -
A step towards an urban and sustainable future
Mark Haycox
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
New
Forms of Green for Mega-Cities:
Peri- and Inter-urban Agricultural Space
Professor Helen Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Ningbo
China – A New Sustainable City for an Old Civilisation
Robin Edmond, FAILA., FRAIA
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Suburban
Entropy and the Death of Difference
(Finding a green way through the Greenfields)
John Mongard AAILA
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Sydney-Canberra,
another 200 mile city?
Dr Dianne Firth
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
The
Nature of Design
SueAnne Ware
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
Copyright
All papers remain the intellectual property of each organization and
individual author(s). Reproduction is prohibited without written
permission of the publisher.
Peer
Review Process
Expressions
of interest for the conference were called from both academics
and professional practitioners from across Australia and overseas.
Abstracts outlining the title and a concise summary of proposed
papers were requested in the first instance. The Editorial Committee
selected proposed papers on their suitability and relevance to
the conference theme and sub-themes. Authors were then invited
to request a peer review of their completed papers and two referees
assessed each paper, with a third referee only used where reviews
were widely divergent. A double blind process was used to maintain
the anonymity of authors and referees. Referees were selected on
the basis of their expertise relevant to the subject of the papers
to be refereed. Refereed papers have been identified and published
separately to the non-refereed papers in the conference proceedings.
Criteria
for Selection
Completed papers were accepted based on the following criteria.
-
The
work was relevant and significant to the body of knowledge
related to the thematic focus within landscape architecture
and beyond.
-
The
work reflected intellectual rigour through a deeper understanding
of contemporary thought, either in theory and/or practice.
-
The
outcomes were identified and based on scholarly reflection
on their significance.
-
The
intent of the work was well articulated and their achievement
substantiated through a well-considered argument.
-
The
work has not been previously published or is in the process
of being published.
Editorial
Committee
- Gill
Lawson BScAgr(Hons), MScAgr, GradDipLandArch(Dist), GradCertEd(HE)
- Professor
Helen Armstrong BSc, GradDipLD, MLArch, PhD, AAILA
- Alan
Chenoweth BAgrSc, GradDipLandArch, MURP, FAILA, FPLA, CPAg,
MASLA, MPIA, MEIANZ, MAIH
Referee
Panel
Associate Professor Janelle Allison, The University of Queensland
Mr Gary Doherty, Aalborg University, Denmark
Dr Ray Green, The University of Melbourne
Ms Feng Han, Tongji University, China
Dr Brian Hudson, Queensland University of Technology
Professor Steffen Lehmann, Queensland University of Technology
Assistant Professor Richard Margerum, University of Oregon, USA
Dr Catriona McLeod, The University of Tasmania
Dr Jeannie Sim, Queensland University of Technology
Professor Frederick Steiner, The University of Texas, USA
Mr Glenn Thomas, Queensland University of Technology
Professor Paul van Beek, Landscape Architect BNT, Rotterdam
Associate Professor Richard Weller, The University of Western Australia
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|